The TV that I bought is PS50C7700 that is that the European model for PN50C8000. I originally was wanting into the LCD version of this that is that the UE40C7700 or 9000s. However, once discussing it with some TV salesmen and researching on some TV review sites, I've set to urge he PN50C8000/PL50c7700. I recently moved to the Netherlands, however I had been eyeing the Samsung 3D TVs for a jiffy back after I was still living in Southern California. I even have to mention i'm terribly satisfy with the acquisition.
I have scan some reviewers that like Panasonic plasma VT25 over the Samsung LCD 8000 series primarily based of the performance of the 3D movies. Plasma works higher with the 3D technology than the LCDs... if you tilt your head sporting the 3D glasses using the LCD TVs, the image can get dimmer. however it does not do this on plasma. Even thought most reviewers are slightly a lot of favorable toward Panasonic, unanimously the reviewers commented that Samsung TVs are much more superior in style whereas the image quality of Panasonic TV is also slightly more superior.
So before you purchase this TV, make certain you recognize what a plasma TV entails: break-in amount (which is around 100-200 hours I think) where you would like to stay the TV in 1/2 the brightness to stop burn in pictures and through this era it's terribly possible the screen can retain pictures after you watch lots of static pictures. Nevertheless, the technology for plasma tvs of late ought to stop your plasma tvs from obtaining any burn-in pictures. So, do not get the burn-in pictures and retention pictures confused. Retention pictures can depart. Burn in does not... and it should not be any downside anymore with the plasma technology of late. On the and facet, this TV (and plasma tvs in general) produces much more superior life-like pictures and may be a heap faster than LCDs.
No comments:
Post a Comment